№ 29 | TDD Cards, Centered vs Connected, Knowledge Operations, Kind Games, and (Not) Avoiding Why

Share
№ 29 | TDD Cards, Centered vs Connected, Knowledge Operations, Kind Games, and (Not) Avoiding Why

TDD Game

Here's a new (in development) board game, created to teach… 🥁Test Driven Development!

From the description:

Play JitterTed's TDD Game where you try to get the most code committed without bugs! Based on the Predictive Test-Driven Development process, you decide whether to take on risk by skipping tests, or play it safe by writing less code along the way.

More at: https://tdd.cards

Centered vs Connected*

As someone who has used the phrase ‘from human-centered to humanity-centered,’ I felt called out—in a healthy, provocative way—by this article from Jen Briselli “The Future of Experience Design Is Connected, Not Centered.” The fundamental frame of this article is that ”the limits of human centered design are in the second word, not the first.” After reading this, I can't help but spot every phrase that follows the ‘[x] centered’ phrasing pattern. 🤔

Knowledge Operations

I'll be revisiting this post several more times—I think there's an intriguing hinted at ‘Knowledge Operations’ taxonomy. But, the focus here is on how “when we change the efficiency of knowledge operations, we change the shape of society” (a response to the AI craze. 🤯

Kind Games

There is so much to love about this proposal from Daniel Cook for Kind Games:

What if we proactively design our games to facilitate positive human relationships? We propose that games built on a foundation of kind aesthetics can deliver greater player satisfaction, greater long term engagement, and richer human experiences.

While the focus on on prosocial games, I can see this same thinking—especially the identified ‘game design patterns for prosocial mechanics’—applied to collaboration software. (NOTE: I copy and pasted the 37 patterns into this table, to make it easier to grok—enjoy!)

(Not) Avoiding Why

“15 Ways To Ask Why Without Asking Why” pairs well with last week's post about good questions. While the context is slightly different (coaching or deepening relationships vs getting answers), both articles promote the shift from the potentially confrontational ‘Why?’  questions to the more exploratory ‘What’ and ‘How’ questions. 

Oh, and you gotta love this off-handed remark:

You’ve probably heard about the  5 Why's. Quoted often, yet rarely implemented (except that time my husband tried it on my teenaged son…)

😂

Read more

№ 119 | Scenarios From the Fable 5 Ban, Type Simulation, Player Agency, Echo Chamber Simulation, A1 Collision Density, Brains on Games, Conversational Leadership Essentials, the HIVE Deck, and a Vincent van Gogh Makeover

№ 119 | Scenarios From the Fable 5 Ban, Type Simulation, Player Agency, Echo Chamber Simulation, A1 Collision Density, Brains on Games, Conversational Leadership Essentials, the HIVE Deck, and a Vincent van Gogh Makeover

Welcome to another edition of Thinking Things, your regular roundup of ‘playful things to think with’ and things to think about! Let’s jump into it… Scenarios from the Fable 5 ban You might have heard that the US government banned Anthropic’s latest LLM model? This isn’t about

By Stephen P. Anderson
№ 118 | Working in Space, BriteBox Idea Generation, Epos Daimon, American Dictator? The Game, Cas Holman and ‘Anji Play’, A Web Typography Learning Game, and The Stratification of Trust

№ 118 | Working in Space, BriteBox Idea Generation, Epos Daimon, American Dictator? The Game, Cas Holman and ‘Anji Play’, A Web Typography Learning Game, and The Stratification of Trust

Welcome to another edition of Thinking Things, your regular roundup of 'playful things to think with’ and things to think about! 🤦I made a mistake. In the last issue, I mentioned a three-line poem from Mary Oliver. As it turns out, this is misinformation. Despite a quick bit

By Stephen P. Anderson
№ 117 | A Special “Two-fer” Edition: Museum Activities, Attention, Technology & Childhood Education, Writing Together, Two Critiques of Org Change, and More Great Conversation Starters

№ 117 | A Special “Two-fer” Edition: Museum Activities, Attention, Technology & Childhood Education, Writing Together, Two Critiques of Org Change, and More Great Conversation Starters

A special “two-fer” edition, featuring things to think with or think about—that happen to pair nicely with each other! Context: While collecting the various things that make it into this newsletter, I sometimes come across posts, frameworks, etc. that feel better to share together, as a pair (or

By Stephen P. Anderson
№ 116 | Mapping the Sources of Power, The Atlas of New Futures, Factitious, Mutual Aid Self Care Zine, Lecture-Zines by Darren Raven, Wild Cards Deck, and the Weight of Worry

№ 116 | Mapping the Sources of Power, The Atlas of New Futures, Factitious, Mutual Aid Self Care Zine, Lecture-Zines by Darren Raven, Wild Cards Deck, and the Weight of Worry

Hello, and welcome to another edition of Thinking Things, your mostly-regular dose of ‘Playful Things to Think With’ (and think about). Mapping the Sources of Power By way of a LinkedIn post from Scott Wolfson comes this map depicting “how experts actually make decisions.” It’s a hand drawn

By Stephen P. Anderson