№ 30 | Security Games, Defining Intelligence & Iteration, Rapoport’s Rules, and the Decider App

№ 30 | Security Games, Defining Intelligence & Iteration, Rapoport’s Rules, and the Decider App

Security games

Where's the emoji for ✨gOLd✨mInE?✨! Here's a page maintained by Adam Shostack “a leading expert on threat modeling” that lists a bunch of security related card games. And… via this thread  (which led me to the link above) are more such games, including Cyber Threat Defender and Data Breach.

Now, I just need a weekend to go through all these games!!

What is intelligence?

At this point, I’d prefer we stop casually referring to things as Artificial Intelligence, and instead embrace more accurate terms: LLMSALAMIPSE (👈 great post, BTW). Don’t label things that aren’t intelligent as intelligence. But then… along comes this post, asking us to reconsider what is intelligence. Ugh.  I’m going to put this article in the love / hate category. Why? Because if we, as the post asks, accept a “biological view of thought embraces many nonhuman ways of thinking” then… does our resulting definition of thinking include the nonhuman? “If a pond can think, what else can think? Where are we going to draw the line?”  🤨 😬

Speaking of words and their meanings….

‘Iterate’

Here's a nice deep dive into the various understandings (or misunderstandings?) of what, exactly, is meant by the word iterate, when used in the context of product teams. 😜

Rapoport’s rules

These “4 Steps to De-Escalate Arguments” felt so familiar I had to look up the HEAR model I shared on Nov 11th (which also referenced the near ubiquitous ‘listening triangle’ used in mediation). Yes, this is quite similar, but…different? Here are the 4 steps the article unpacks:

Rule #1: Explain the other person’s position clearly, vividly, and justly
Rule #2: Mention anything you’ve learned
Rule #3: List the points on which you agree
Rule #4: Only now make a critique or refutation

Making group decisions

I had hoped for an actual app, but… The Decider App is a step in this direction. Basically, it's an explanation of eight decision making models, from the autocratic to the stochastic to… (just check it out!). As the site declares:

Decide Better Together There are lots of group decision-making models. Explore each and find one that works well for your group's needs and circumstance.

Read more

№ 105 | Startup Valley, The Farmer Was Replaced , Five Beliefs (about Community Software), Cartography of Generative AI, When Are We? Game, Square Circle Triangle, Challenging the Pedagogy & Andragogy Distinction, and Two Speeches Worth Your Attention

№ 105 | Startup Valley, The Farmer Was Replaced , Five Beliefs (about Community Software), Cartography of Generative AI, When Are We? Game, Square Circle Triangle, Challenging the Pedagogy & Andragogy Distinction, and Two Speeches Worth Your Attention

Welcome to another curious assemblage of fun and fascinating ‘things to think with’. Or think about. Or… do something with! 🤪 Startup Valley game So what’s it like to launch a startup? Startup Valley Game: Blitzed Edition gives us a taste of that experience, with plenty of humorous quips thrown

By Stephen P. Anderson
№ 103 | ‘At What Cost?’, The Tarot Cards of Tech, Two Visuals to Improve Your Next Talk, The Mind’s Pendulum, Habits of a Systems Thinker Cards, Afrofuturism and the “future past”, and Four Ways Humans Relate to Technology

№ 103 | ‘At What Cost?’, The Tarot Cards of Tech, Two Visuals to Improve Your Next Talk, The Mind’s Pendulum, Habits of a Systems Thinker Cards, Afrofuturism and the “future past”, and Four Ways Humans Relate to Technology

Another dose of playful things to think with. Perhaps a little less playful… And a wee bit more somber and cerebral… But, all good things to think about! ‘At What Cost?’ Here’s your perennial reminder to think about the unintended consequences of the things we design, build, and use.

By Stephen P. Anderson